my local muffler shop said theyd redirect my exhaust out the side for $160 (so i can fit in a WVO tank.) they said its illegal because the tailpipe must come out behind the rearmost opening window.
i dont mind breaking the law, but i do have a rule about breaking only one law at a time.
side exhaust illegal?
Moderator: BCDelica
- after oil
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:01 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: 92 cham-reimo poptop L300. 78MB240D
- Location: on the road
- Location: occupied coast salish territory aka powell river
- delicat
- Posts: 2331
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:26 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: '92 Exeed '93 Safari '94 Pajero
- Location: New Westminster, BC
- Location: New Westminster, BC
Re: side exhaust illegal?
Very simple solution,
Just lock your rear window so that it no longer opens... (until you need it then know how to easily de-activate your luck!)
Unless you have a sliding window I'd doubt you'd have any issue and even with a slider one... Especially that I didn't find anything about the side exhaust in the Motor Vehicle Act. There's lot of "don't do" in the MVA though, at the end it's up to you.
Just lock your rear window so that it no longer opens... (until you need it then know how to easily de-activate your luck!)
Unless you have a sliding window I'd doubt you'd have any issue and even with a slider one... Especially that I didn't find anything about the side exhaust in the Motor Vehicle Act. There's lot of "don't do" in the MVA though, at the end it's up to you.
- Attachments
-
- Picture 3.png (31.69 KiB) Viewed 4513 times
-
- Picture 1.png (48.79 KiB) Viewed 4515 times
'93 Nissan Patrol
'94 Mitsubishi Pajero

"If it ain't broken, modify it!"
'94 Mitsubishi Pajero

"If it ain't broken, modify it!"
-
- Posts: 3257
- Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:18 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: 1994 L400 Royal Exceed PF8W
- Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
- Contact:
Re: side exhaust illegal?
I have to agree, I have never seen anything to indicate a legal reason not to have a side outlet exhaust.
Though I do have to agree that having it further forward than an open window is probably a bad idea, and therefore something to keep in mind while driving.
Though I do have to agree that having it further forward than an open window is probably a bad idea, and therefore something to keep in mind while driving.
- after oil
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:01 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: 92 cham-reimo poptop L300. 78MB240D
- Location: on the road
- Location: occupied coast salish territory aka powell river
Re: side exhaust illegal?
thats great!
bad news is: no flame?!?!! aww c'mon guys... we're never allowed to have fun no more!
bad news is: no flame?!?!! aww c'mon guys... we're never allowed to have fun no more!
- jwfchase
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:36 pm
- Member's Photo Album: http://www.delica.ca/Photos/
- Vehicle: '92 Super Exceed
- Location: Kamloops, BC
Re: side exhaust illegal?
Doesn't seem to be much enforcement out there on the "excessive noise, removed baffles or increased noise" sections either.
-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:12 am
- Vehicle: 1991 Mitsubishi Pajero
- Location: Calgary
Re: side exhaust illegal?
The crown prosecutors are real lazy about that one. They usually use that as a giveaway when negotiating tickets. To much effort to get a conviction. (It wouldn't be that hard but they are just not interested in doing the work.)jwfchase wrote:Doesn't seem to be much enforcement out there on the "excessive noise, removed baffles or increased noise" sections either.
- mararmeisto
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:00 am
- Vehicle: 2018 Ram EcoDiesel
- Location: Dartmouth, NS
Re: side exhaust illegal?
Does 'vehicle' not include motorcycles, because there are a whole lot of them that are 'excessively noisy'. Of course, not many motorcycles have mufflers - tailpipes, but no mufflers.bae146 wrote:The crown prosecutors are real lazy about that one. They usually use that as a giveaway when negotiating tickets. To much effort to get a conviction. (It wouldn't be that hard but they are just not interested in doing the work.)jwfchase wrote:Doesn't seem to be much enforcement out there on the "excessive noise, removed baffles or increased noise" sections either.
JPL
I still miss my '94 Pajero!
I still miss my '94 Pajero!